This week we're profiling some of my favorite Sherlockian bloggers as we approach the second anniversary next month of this blog. Today's Q&A guest is Jaime N. Mahoney, proprietor of Better Holmes & Gardens.
When did you launch Better Homes & Gardens?
Better Holmes & Gardens
launched on January 14, 2011. I was living a bit of a different life then, and
I was able to write and post on a weekly basis, if not more frequently.
Circumstances have changed a bit since then, but I still post regularly –
several times a month when I can manage it. It never feels like enough,
however. I always have ideas.
What were your inspirations?
As Christopher Morley said,
“When was so much written by so many for so few?” It was hard to read the
immense volume of Sherlockian scholarship that has been researched and written
over the years and not be inspired to do the same. Or at least attempt to do the
same. Attempt is probably the better
word. Alistair Duncan (http://alistaird221b.blogspot.com/) was also a big inspiration for
my early efforts. I remember saying that I wanted to start a blog about
Sherlock Holmes, but I couldn’t imagine I had anything to say that hadn’t
already been said. “Well,” Alistair told me, “That’s never stopped me.” I’ve also
been lucky to find a great community of Sherlockian bloggers, like Matt Laffey
(http://always1895.net/) and Leah Cummins Guinn (http://wellreadsherlockian.com/), who inspire me to keep
writing, and keep things fresh and thoughtful.
I write the blog that I’d want
to read, which I suppose might be a simplistic way of looking at things. It
never occurred to me that anyone would want to read my writing, outside of
people that might feel some sort of familial obligation to do so. I write about
Sherlock Holmes because it gives me joy, and my aim is to convey that to
people. I write about the elements of Sherlockiana that interest me, and that I
hope others will also find interesting. Fortunately, that gives me a lot of
topics on which I can write. There are many niches in Sherlockiana, and
everyone has a favorite or something about which they want to know more. Thank
goodness Sherlockians are lifelong learners by trade.
You have a day job. Where in the
world do you find the time to write such a reflective blog?
I’ve lived two professional
lives since I started Better Holmes & Gardens. In my first life, I had a
very long commute (at least two hours on a good day, usually more), and I had a
lot of time to think. And talk. Out loud. To myself. In the car. I’d think and
talk and make notes at stoplights and take voice memos on my phone (and
honestly probably didn’t look half as crazy as many of my fellow commuters). By
the time I’d get home in the evening, the posts would be nearly crafted or well
on their way to being so.
Now I have a much shorter commute.
I’m not going to say how much shorter
because many of my former fellow commuters would sooner take my head off as
hear me say it, but now I have a lot more free time. But as we all know,
inspiration is variable and some afternoons I find myself screaming at a blank
Word document as if it has some personal vendetta against me – so sometimes I
write in the morning, or late into the night. Mostly I write about Sherlock
Holmes because it’s important to me, but even more so because it makes me
ridiculously happy. I always said I would stop blogging about Sherlock Holmes
when it stopped being fun. Would you believe that hasn’t happened yet?
You also have a project in which
you tweet entire canonical Sherlock Holmes stories, 140 characters at a time.
What has been the reaction to that?
From the responses I’ve
received, about half think the project is great fun, the other half thinks I’m
a raving lunatic, and I suppose both assessments are fair. I’ve had a couple of
people ask me why I’m doing it at all, and my answer is usually, “Well, why
not?” I’ve also been asked why I’m confining myself to 140 characters (when I
could easily post larger excerpts on my Facebook page, for example) and I think
it’s really about the challenge. I want to see if it can be done, and I think
it can be, but at the rate I’m going, Twitter will probably be overthrown for
another social media platform before I’m done.
Do you actually retype the
stories or do you copy and paste from an electronic version?
It depends on both the story and
the day. I like to post excerpts at least twice a day (occasionally three
times, if I can manage it), so if I’m pressed for time I’ll copy and paste from
an electronic version (http://ignisart.com/camdenhouse/canon/index.html) and then break the passage
down into 140 character increments. I’ll also do this if there is a
particularly complicated passage of story or dialogue, something that I want to
make sure I get precisely right.
But I far prefer to retype the
passages when I can manage it. Sir Arthur Conan Doyle was just genius at the
perfectly chosen, perfectly expressive word, and some of them really leap out
at the reader, particularly when the story is taken in small portions. For
example, in “The Bruce-Partington Plans,” which I tweeted in August 2012, Doyle
used “subsided” to describe the way in which Mycroft Holmes sits in a chair.
Isn’t that marvelously evocative? What’s
particularly great about the project is that I can get a sense – via “Retweets”
and “Favorites” – about what passages strike a chord with readers and that one
was popular.
What is your favorite canonical
Sherlock Holmes story and why?
If I had to choose, it would
probably be “The Six Napoleons,” as it’s such a wonderfully inventive and
imaginative mystery. In addition, I think it’s one of the few stories where readers
really get to know Sherlock Holmes,
if they look in the right places. Some time ago, I wrote a post on six separate
aspects of Holmes’s personality seen in SIXN (http://betterholmesandgardens.blogspot.com/2011/06/it-was-admirable-hiding-place-adventure.html), which was a rather fun angle
of examination. And of course, there is something very powerful about the
conclusion of SIXN, where Holmes is moved to softer emotions by Inspector
Lestrade’s compliment. I think most readers are particularly susceptible to
evidence of Holmes and Watson’s enduring friendship, and occasionally it’s nice
to see how other characters could have a similar impact. The way in which
Holmes reacts to Lestrade in that instance is profound, and I’ve always thought
it’s a rather golden canonical moment.
On your Facebook page, you often
call attention to Sherlockian products on e-bay. What are a few of the most
prized Sherlock Holmes books and memorabilia that you own?
Two of my favorite pieces were
gifts from my husband – not because they have any particular monetary value,
but because they were his way of saying, “All right, you love this. And I love
you.” One is a framed picture of Jeremy Brett as Sherlock Holmes. It’s not
signed or vintage or in any way valuable, but he bought the picture and picked
out the frame himself. I keep it in my office and new visitors always ask me if
I’m “related to the gentleman in the top hat.” And one year for my birthday he
had some custom M&Ms made (http://www.mymms.com/) with the distinctive
Sherlockian silhouette. He had two bags made for me to eat, and then had some
put in a glass jar with cork that I keep as a memento. He continuously shows an
unparalleled understanding of my personality that leaves me humbled.
I also own a first edition of
Vincent Starrett’s The Private Life of
Sherlock Holmes. It’s not in great condition, but I value it for a lot of
reasons. Primarily because when I found it in the bookstore, I immediately took
to Twitter for help in dating the book. Several people assisted me, including
Matt Laffey of Always1895.net. He probably doesn’t remember helping me, but I
do. It was such a neat way of connecting with the online Sherlockian community,
and it’s a bright memory for me.
And I also own a copy of The Sign of Four written entirely in
shorthand – because don’t we all need to own one of those?
What has it meant to you to be a
Sherlockian?
There’s a quote from Ralph Waldo
Emerson that I’ve always liked: “What's a book? Everything or nothing. The eye
that sees it all.” I’ve always felt that this applies to how I feel about being
a Sherlockian. What does being a Sherlockian mean? Nothing – it means nothing
in the long term, and nothing to someone who doesn’t understand or share my
enthusiasm. But it means everything to me. Being a Sherlockian is how I
identify myself and that means education and community and friendship. It means
a sense of belonging and a place in the world. It means that I will always know
and be able to find other people like me. It means that I have a voice. And
that means everything.
What genres and particular
writers do you like to read outside the Holmes universe?
Not to give an annoyingly dodgy
answer, but I like to think I read a little bit of everything. I love Stephen
King and Terry Pratchett, and the author who bridges all genres, Neil Gaiman.
My favorite non-Sherlockian novel is The
Shadow of the Wind, by Carlos Ruiz Zafón, which I like to describe as a
romance novel for people who are love with books. It’s a novel that will both
ruin your life and make it infinitely better.
I love books about books, and
historical fiction (of course), and I’ve recently discovered a love of memoirs
of all types. I also recommend the Barker & Llewelyn mysteries by Will
Thomas – a series of Victorian detective mysteries for those who don’t want to
make the journey all the way to Baker Street.
No comments:
Post a Comment