In his delightful new book, The Great Detective, Zach Dundas recalls that magic moment when he
first encountered Sherlock Holmes:
I discovered a thick, brick-red-covered, dog-eared book in my school library in Montana one suitably frigid winter’s day when I was about eleven years old. The volume bore some pre-gender-equity title like The Boys’ Sherlock Holmes. It smelled faintly of mold and many small hands. I opened to the first story, spied the exotic, very adult title “A Scandal in Bohemia,” and tumbled in. In some sense, I suppose, I was never seen again.
Later he refers again to “The Boys’ Sherlock Holmes (or whatever it was).”
That’s exactly what it was. At least, there is a very
fine book of that title edited by Howard Haycraft, best known as the author of the
classic Murder for Pleasure: The Life and
Times of the Detective Story. And it is a volume that means a lot to me,
for it was the first Holmes book I
ever read. I borrowed it one Saturday in the early 1960s from the main branch
of the Public Library of Cincinnati and Hamilton County. (I later cleverly
arranged my life so that I now work right across the street from that very
building.)
In my opinion, the line-up of stories for readers new
to the Great Detective is an excellent one. In addition to an introduction and
an essay on Dr. Joseph Bell as the model for Holmes, Haycraft included A Study in Scarlet (with the American
section summarized for young readers), The
Sign of Four, The Hound of the Baskervilles, and a half-dozen of the finest
short stories from The Adventures and
The Memoirs. (“A Scandal in Bohemia”
is among them, but not the first.)
When I had a chance to buy a 1961 edition of the book
some years ago, I couldn’t resist. I’ve held it in my hands many times since,
but never read it. Therefore, I was taken
aback when Dundas commented that the editor expurgated some scenes for younger
readers. I opened the volume to The Sign
of Four and immediately saw that he was right. The shocking opening passage
with the cocaine – gone! Holmes coming full circle at the end with cocaine again
– gone!
No matter. I’m not normally in favor of tampering with
perfection, but in this case that eccentricity just adds to the charm of a book
that I encountered more than half a century ago and am pleased to have in my
library now.
No comments:
Post a Comment