Amid a bumper crop of new Sherlock Holmes stories, Bonnie
MacBird’s Art in the Blood stands out.
MacBird demonstrates that one doesn’t have to re-imagine Holmes
as unshaven, African-American, or a highly functioning sociopath in order to be
creative and engaging.
Art in the Blood is
what we have come to call a “traditional” Sherlock Holmes story, meaning that Watson
tells the tale and Arthur Conan Doyle would recognize the characters. MacBird
doesn’t substitute her vision for the Agent’s. When Holmes impatiently says “Yes,
yes, of course” and Dr. Watson immediately orders brandy for a stricken man, our
heroes are acting true to form.
With its interlocking story lines, the plot is more complex and
the book longer than any of the four Canonical novels. But the fast pace evokes
The Sign of Four and The Hound of the Baskervilles: “I
fingered the revolver, cold and reassuring, in my pocket. Against my better
instincts, I found the thrill of adventure rising inside in me like an unwanted
fever.” That’s our Watson!
The burned-out Holmes we encounter at the beginning is saved
from his own self-destructive impulses by the good Watson’s attentions and a problem
presented by a letter in invisible ink from a beautiful French chanteuse whose
son has disappeared. That is only the beginning of a case that involves aristocracy,
art theft, and the murders of several young boys.
MacBird’s years in the film business show in the sold structure
of the novel. Art in the Blood is not
just a good Sherlock Holmes story, but also a fine mystery with an unexpected
villain and a strong finish.
(Full disclosure: Bonnie MacBird had kind words for my Rogues Gallery and thanked me at the end
of Art in the Blood for a minor favor.
But if all of her Sherlockian friends banned themselves from writing about the
book it would get almost no reviews at all.)
Thanks, Dan. This is a great review and I'm calling me local bookstore as soon as it opens!
ReplyDelete