Bert Coules, Mark Gegan, Ray Betzner, and Steve Doyle at McSorley's Old Ale House. Photo courtesy of Jacquelynn Bost Morris |
Ray Betzner, BSI (“The Agony Column”), curates
the blog Studies in Starrett, “an exploration of the works of Charles
Vincent Emerson Starrett.” I asked Ray a few questions about himself and
about Starrett, one of the premier figures in the first
generation of Sherlockians.
First of all, just to get our bearings on this topic,
where would you place Vincent Starrett’s star in the Sherlockian galaxy?
How important was he in the twentieth century and how important is he
today?
I place Starrett on
equal footing with Christopher Morley and Edgar Smith, the troika of the
Sherlockian Golden Age in the United States. Like Morley and Smith, Starrett’s
affinity for Holmes started when he was a boy. But they diverged in adult life:
Morley collected friends and Starrett collected books, while Smith had a mind
for organization and a secretary to do the hard work.
Starrett’s book, The Private Life of Sherlock Holmes, helped many in this country realize they were not alone in their Holmes idolatry. Before the internet connected Sherlockians, Starrett was one of those vital links that helped build the Holmes community we enjoy today. He deserves a good-sized star in the Sherlockian firmament for that alone.
Probably Starrett’s best-known work is the groundbreaking The Private
Life of Sherlock Holmes. You
edited Gasogene Books’ handsome 75th anniversary
edition. How many copies of the book in various
editions do you own?
All of them. Which is to say, that I have at least one copy
of every edition produced in the U.S., England and Japan. All together, it’s 15
by my count.
Steve Doyle and Mark Gagen deserve a lot of credit for that
book. They didn’t stint in the production values. We wanted to make a book that
Starrett would have been proud to put on his shelf, and I think we succeeded.
Is The Private Life the most important
book about Sherlock Holmes not written by Arthur Conan Doyle?
That’s a tough question. As much as I am an advocate for Private Life, its influence in the last
several decades has waned as newer works have come along, like William S.
Baring-Gould’s Annotated Sherlock Holmes,
which will likely be eclipsed by Les Klinger’s books.
To really enjoy it today, you have to treat Private Life as a product of its time.
Otherwise, it will seem hopelessly out of touch with modern life. Despite this,
there are some passages that are timeless. Like this:
“But there can be no grave for Sherlock Holmes or Watson …
Shall they not always live on Baker Street? Are they not there this instant, as
one writes? … Outside, the hansoms rattle through the rain, and Moriarty plans
his latest devilry. Within, the sea-coal flames upon the hearth, and Holmes and
Watson take their well-won ease … So they still live for all that love them
well: in a romantic chamber of the heart: in a nostalgic country of the mind:
where it is always 1895.”
As a teenager, you encountered the Canon and The
Private Life at the same time. Do you think that simultaneity had
anything to do with your passion for Starrett?
Absolutely. The two books are forever linked for me. It’s
also true that the copy of Private Life
I first read (the 1960 University of Chicago edition), opened my eyes to a
group called the Baker Street Irregulars. The BSI seemed like a Valhalla to a
teenager growing up amidst the steel mills of Pittsburgh. I never thought I
would one day be a member of that group. I am still amazed.
Billy Wilder’s “The Private Life of Sherlock Holmes” has
nothing to do with the Starrett book. Do you ever wish the film had a
different title?
I like the film, although Starrett did not. He was a huge
fan, and friend, of Basil Rathbone and ranked his Sherlock among the best.
Rathbone fit Starrett’s desire for a cold, calculating machine capable of
working out the most tangled skein. Billy Wilder’s camp and hints of
homosexuality did not sit well with Starrett.
What is your second favorite Starrett work? And
why?
Starrett’s sonnet, “221-B” is immortal. I can still get a
little choked up reading it. There’s one line that summarizes my relationship
to the Holmes world: “Only those things the heart believes are true.” If you
lack this sense of child-like wonder, you will only see Holmes as cardboard
caricature.
Starrett only attended one meeting of the Baker
Street Irregulars in his long life, but was very active in the Sherlockian
community in Chicago and in print. What has it meant to you to be part of a
large network of friends sharing your interest in the great detective?
Starrett stayed close to Chicago because of the fragile
emotional health of his second wife, Ray Latimer. I, on the other hand, have
had the great joy of being with Sherlockians in New York, Philadelphia,
Chicago, Minneapolis, Baltimore, Indianapolis and even little Morgantown, W.Va.
Many of the men and women I meet in these places have become an extended
family. Their wit, scholarship and friendship have been a big part of my life.
How is being a Sherlockian in the age of social media
different than it was in 1934, when Christopher Morley founded the Baker Street
Irregulars, or even in 1974, when Starrett died?
There are a lot of differences, but here’s one that strikes
me as significant: In the past, you were largely restricted to being a Holmes
fan at those moments when you corresponded with others or attended an event.
Now, people live out their association with Holmes 24/7.
While some lament the loss of exclusivity that came with the fading of an elect (and eclectic) group of (mostly) men who controlled the Holmes movement in the past, the Sherlock Holmes movement of today is diverse, lively, challenging and often utterly delightful. This is meant to fun, not a religion with a litmus test of orthodoxy. To quote Morley (from a different context): "The whole matter is now hopelessly, delightfully and permanently confused. Long may it so remain!"
While some lament the loss of exclusivity that came with the fading of an elect (and eclectic) group of (mostly) men who controlled the Holmes movement in the past, the Sherlock Holmes movement of today is diverse, lively, challenging and often utterly delightful. This is meant to fun, not a religion with a litmus test of orthodoxy. To quote Morley (from a different context): "The whole matter is now hopelessly, delightfully and permanently confused. Long may it so remain!"
I have come to appreciate today’s movement, while
maintaining a great respect for those of the Golden Age.
What is your favorite Sherlockian activity or event? And
why?
While I love the twice-yearly meetings of the Sons of the
Copper Beeches in Philadelphia, nothing beats the Baker Street Irregulars
dinner weekend. The energy and joy that comes from gathering hundreds of
like-minded men and women from around the globe is like Christmas, New Year’s
and Mardi Gras rolled into one. At the same time, I especially cherish the
quiet moments spent with a handful of folks over a meal or a drink as we share
stories, remember absent friends, and plan new projects. Why else would
otherwise sane people go to New York City in January?
To learn more about Vincent Starrett, check out Studies in Starrett and the Facebook page.
Nice, thanks.
ReplyDelete