Welcome! Like the book of the same name, this blog is an eclectic collection of Sherlockian scribblings based on more than a half-century of reading Sherlock Holmes. Please add your own thoughts. You can also follow me on Twitter @DanAndriacco and on my Facebook fan page at Dan Andriacco Mysteries. You might also be interested in my Amazon Author Page. My books are also available at Barnes & Noble and in all main electronic formats including Kindle, Nook, Kobo and iBooks for the iPad.
Friday, November 15, 2013
A Full Life, and a Story Often Retold
Just how many biographies of Arthur Conan Doyle does one need?
In my case, at least two more. That's how many I bought last weekend at my favorite used bookstore: Conan Doyle: The Man Who Created Sherlock Holmes, by Andrew Lycett, and The Adventures of Arthur Conan Doyle, by Russell Miller.
The shelves of my library already included Conan Doyle biographies of varying accuracy by Pierre Nordon, Charles Higham, John Dickson Carr, Martin Booth, and (by no means least) Daniel Stashower. I also own a number of other books about ACD, including the invaluable Life in Letters edited by Stashower, Jon Lellenberg, and Chalres Foley.
And yet, even though I'm not known to be a free-spending soul, I acquired still more. Why?
First of all, my writing on this blog or for talks occasionally takes me away from Sherlock Holmes and into the realm of Arthur Conan Doyle. It's nice to have books about him handy for easy research.
Probably no one's life can be completely told in any one book, no matter how thick, and that's all the more true of a man with such varied accomplishments as Sir Arthur Conan Doyle. His was a full and adventurous life during in which he excelled at many different roles - whaler, doctor, writer, amateur sleuth, crusader, spiritualist, and politician. He even wrote a few detective stories! So it's good to have several biographies.
Also, the ones I just bought, published in 2007 (Lycett) and 2008 (Miller) are newer than the others I already owned. That doesn't guarantee that they are better than their predecessors, but they may have the benefit of some new material that wasn't available to earlier scholars.
All of the above is true. But, really, the main reason I got these books is that they were in front of me . . . and I just couldn't resist.
Posted by Doctor Dan at 12:00 AM