My recent blog post on
Sherlockian references in Dorothy L. Sayers’s Strong Poison elicited an amazing communication from my friend Sandy Dreier Kozinn.
She sent me an incredible 16 Word documents analyzing the Holmes-Wimsey
connections book by book. She plumbed the depths more deeply than I ever could
have.
With her permission, I offer now
as an example of this fine work her perceptive analysis of Whose Body?, the first Wimsey adventure. She occasionally refers to Lord Peter as
LP. The page numbers refer to an omnibus edition, Triple Wimsey, from Harper
& Row. (The volume also includes Murder Must Advertise and Strong Poison.)
Subtitle
– “The Singular Adventure of the Man with the Golden Pince Nez” is a clear
reference to “The Adventure of the Golden Pince Nez” in The Return of Sherlock Holmes.
General: Bunter sounds a lot like Brunton, the butler
in “The Musgrave Ritual.”
p. 33 – “unless he [Levy] was a most
consummate actor” – which Holmes ,
of course, was, as is stated variously in the Canon.
p. 38 – “Did you realize the
importance of that?” LP asks
Parker. The whole conversation,
including LP's put-down of Parker, reads like a bit out of the Canon with Holmes chiding Watson for his lack
of deduction from observation.
p. 66 – Bunter, to get information, disparages Peter with “up again to call him early to go off
Sherlocking at the other end of the country.
And the mud he gets on his clothes and his boots!” Holmes , of course,
can tell where mud comes from by simply looking.
Ch. V,
p. 90 – “Good parchment paper written with a fine nib by an elderly business
man of old-fashioned habits.” Holmes is
always making deductions from letters; the paper is especially relevant in “A
Scandal in Bohemia,” whereas the handwriting deduction stems from “Reigate
Squires.”
p. 91 – the response to Peter 's
ad is reminiscent of the many cases in which Holmes ,
too, knows how to use ads to gain information.
p. 92 & 93 – Holmes also knows
how to make deductions from mud on boots, LP here does it with typical
Sherlockian thoroughness.
p. 96 – “What a dull Agony Column!” This was Holmes’s daily reading, too.
p.
106 – “the aged spider sitting invisible in the centre of the vibrating web” –
“He is the Napoleon of crime, Watson ... He has a
brain of the first order. He sits
motionless, like a spider in the centre of its web, but that web has a thousand
radiations, and he knows well every quiver of each of them.” – “The Final Problem”
Ch. VI,
p. 124 – Gladys Horrocks goes out to the
Plumbers’ and Glaziers’ Ball; was this a reference to the gasfitter's ball
attended by Miss Mary Sutherland, whose father was a plumber in the Tottenham
Court Road, in “A Case of Identity?”
Ch. IX , p. 186 – LP is glad he's puzzled Parker because it makes
him “feel like Sherlock
Holmes .” Later on, on the same page, Peter remarks
that he is “Ready to tackle Professor Moriarty or Leon Kestrel or any of ’em.”
Ch. XI , p. 211 – LP’s “mind had been warped in its young growth
by “Raffles” and “Sherlock Holmes...”
Dorothy L. Sayers was clearly a great admirer of Sherlock Holmes; but the reason why roses should cure someone of being an ass has nothing to do with "The Naval Treaty" and a great deal to do with "The Golden Ass" of Lucius Apuleius.
ReplyDeleteThere are several good pastiches out there with Holmes and Lord Peter encountering each other. It turns out that Holmes is Peter's godfather. (I'm in the middle of rereading the Lord Peter books right now - I'm up to "Strong Poison" - and there are a lot of Sherlockian references scattered throughout.)
ReplyDeleteOh this is delightful, and confirms what I must've long suspected but never fully acknowledged.
ReplyDelete